Webearly childhood. I strongly recommend publication of this paper in BMJ, and the paper can be published as it is after minor editorial revision. Authors: We would like to thank Professor Stoltenberg for her kind comments. Minor specific comments Reviewer: Page 3, line 32-33 Data sharing. Why do the authors say that “No additional data will be WebApr 4, 2016 · Sun and Linton (2014), Hierons (2016) and Craig (2010) offer useful discussions on the subject of “desk rejections.”. 4. Make a good first impression with …
How to review a paper Science AAAS
WebJun 11, 2024 · Look at your reference list and identify authors of articles that were fundamental in forming your research question. Only suggest reviewers that are currently active in the field, i.e., have published articles on the topic in the past 3 years. Aim for a spread of reviewers across faculty ranks. Include at least one big name in your field. Webrapport-social.ch. I recommend to c arefully study this publication in o rder to be able to unders tand the corr elation between. [...] water equivalent and cp and the various interferences. systag.ch. systag.ch. I ch empfehle dem Leser, diese Publikation genau zu st udieren, um die Zusammenhänge bezüglich Wasserwert. ipf warriors
How to Suggest Reviewers for Your Paper - Enago Academy
WebJan 13, 2012 · Journals always ask reviewers to recommend whether an article should be published as is, or whether the writer should do small or large revisions. They also ask if the article should be rejected outright. Making a publication recommendation can feel like the hardest part of the reviewing process. New reviewers often think they don’t have… WebSep 29, 2014 · An editor makes one of the following decisions for a peer–reviewed manuscript: 1. Accept in its present form: This means that the journal will publish the paper in its original form, and no changes are required. It is extremely unusual for a paper to receive this decision. Related Infographic Possible outcomes of peer review WebA minimal review, solely stating that the paper does not meet your minimum requirements for publication in the scientific literature, is much more valuable than declining to review … ipfw application